Teachers Fired for Speech: Recent Cases and Implications

long

In recent years, several teachers have been terminated for expressions related to social or political topics, either in the classroom or on personal social media. These incidents span diverse viewpoints and have fueled ongoing discussions about free speech protections for public educators versus institutional expectations for neutrality. The following examples outline key details from three such cases.

2023, St. Philip's College, Texas: Adjunct biology professor Johnson Varkey was fired after stating in class that biological sex is determined by X and Y chromosomes, prompting student complaints of discrimination and walkouts. He was reinstated following a settlement with the college. Link
2023, Jurupa Unified School District, California: Tenured PE teacher Jessica Tapia was terminated for declining to use students' preferred pronouns and for not disclosing students' gender transitions to parents, citing her religious beliefs. The district reached a $360,000 settlement with her in 2024. Link
2025, Jourdanton High School, Texas: Social studies teacher Matthew Justin Holland was placed on administrative leave and later unanimously fired by the school board after a social media post about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, gained widespread attention. The post was made outside school hours. Link

In two of these cases, the initial terminations were followed by settlements or reinstatements, while the third proceeded to final termination. Such outcomes highlight varying approaches to handling teacher speech, particularly when it occurs off-campus. These situations prompt consideration of several issues in educational policy and employment:

To what extent should school districts regulate teachers' expressions made outside of work?
How do district guidelines align with legal protections for free speech and personal beliefs?
In what ways do public reactions influence decisions about employee conduct?

These cases contribute to wider conversations on the boundaries of expression in public schools.