Note: I've prepared this background as an individual member of the CUSD Board of Education. It is my own effort to inform the community and does not represent the official position of the full CUSD Board. I've tried to present both sides fairly; the discussion below is open to all views.
What's happening
A family in the neighboring Sunnyvale School District has sued the district in federal court (Taylor v. Sunnyvale School District, filed June 22, 2026). The parents asked to be notified and to opt their elementary-age children out of LGBTQ+-inclusive books and lessons on religious grounds. The district initially offered an opt-out (fall 2025), then reversed course in early 2026, stating the instruction "is not optional and is not subject to parent opt-out provisions." The family is represented by the Becket Fund and a Pepperdine law clinic.
The legal tension (this is the real crux)
The case sits between two authorities pointing in opposite directions:
Mahmoud v. Taylor (U.S. Supreme Court, June 2025, 6–3): parents have a First Amendment religious right to notice and an opt-out when LGBTQ+ storybooks are used in instruction.
California law (the
FAIR Education Act and related Education Code): districts must provide
LGBTQ+-inclusive instruction as part of the core curriculum, which the district read as not subject to opt-out.
So a California district is caught between a federal constitutional ruling and a state mandate — and that same tension applies to CUSD.
What each side argues
Parental-rights view: families, not schools, should have the final say over religious/moral exposure for young children; the Supreme Court has now
recognized a right to opt out.
Inclusive-curriculum view: an inclusive curriculum reflects all families and students,
state law requires it, and carve-outs undermine both the law and the students it's meant to include.
Where CUSD Stands
Unlike Sunnyvale, CUSD currently allows religious opt-outs. Per the district's public 2026-2027 Opening Day Packet / Annual Notification:
The opt-out exists. "In accordance with federal guidance, as outlined in Mahmoud v. Taylor and Board Policy 6141.2, parents/guardians may, via written request, opt their students out of instruction on the basis of their religious beliefs." An opted-out student may be offered an alternative activity of similar educational value, with no disciplinary or academic penalty.
The request must be specific. A parent must identify the student, the specific instructional content, the specific religious belief(s) involved, and how that content "substantially interferes" with those beliefs.
Board-adopted vs. supplemental materials. All families are notified of the Board-adopted curriculum, which — under California's FAIR Education Act — includes LGBTQ+-inclusive content in Social Studies. Teachers may also use supplemental materials (Board Policy 6161.11).
Notice of supplemental materials is now opt-in. For 2026-2027, to receive notice when supplemental lessons are used — the notice a parent needs in order to request an opt-out — a parent must ask in advance, by emailing the principal by
August 27, 2026 (or within 10 days of the child's first day). Previously, these notices went to the whole class.
In short: CUSD kept the opt-out, but for the coming year a parent must proactively request supplemental-material notices to be positioned to use it.
Why it matters for CUSD
Two questions for our community: first, does CUSD's current approach — a retained opt-out, but opt-in notification for supplemental materials — strike the right balance? Second, who should decide changes in a contested area like this: the elected Board, or district administrators?
