Campaign Conduct in Our Community - Survey #22
From 2026-09-01 to 2026-10-07
Verified voters: 38 (Total: 46)
My name is Long Jiao. I'm a Cupertino resident and a member of the CUSD Board of Education, and I want to hear from across our whole district — Cupertino, Sunnyvale, San Jose, Santa Clara, Los Altos, and the unincorporated areas in between. This survey is conducted solely by me and does not represent the official position of the CUSD Board. In the interest of full transparency, I've endorsed candidates in this year's Cupertino City Council races — so I want to be clear this survey is about the conduct of our local elections, not about advantaging any candidate. Sign tampering is wrong whoever it happens to, and in whatever city it happens.
Every election season, in every one of our cities, residents report campaign signs being removed, damaged, or placed without permission. This short, candidate-neutral survey asks about your experience and what you think should be done — wherever you live. It takes about two minutes.
A note for neighbors outside Cupertino: a couple of questions mention Cupertino's specific sign rules as an example. If you live in another city the exact ordinance differs, but the questions about what you've seen and what you believe apply to your town just as much — answer with your own community in mind.
And how it works: every question lets you pick an answer and add your own comment — the comment box is always there. If the options don't fit, tell me in your own words.
Summary
Q1. This election season, have you seen or heard of any of the following — to you, your household, or people you know (neighbors, friends)? (select all that apply) "Front yard" = the private area between a house and the sidewalk; "park strip" = the city strip between the sidewalk and the street.
45 answered · select all that apply (may exceed 100%)
A sign removed or stolen from a front yard11 (17) · 38%
A sign damaged or defaced6 (10) · 22%
A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission4 (7) · 16%
A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission5 (7) · 16%
A sign put back after the resident had removed it4 (7) · 16%
None of the above24 (26) · 58%
Q2. Did you know that in California, stealing or defacing campaign signs can be prosecuted as petty theft or vandalism — and that you can report it to the police?
45 answered
No, I didn't know16 (17) · 38%
Q3. Did you know that under Cupertino's sign code, a political sign may be placed on the "park strip" only with the adjacent resident's permission (§ 19.104.250) — and that the resident may remove an unauthorized one (§ 19.104.340)? Want the full picture? [Read the background on campaign-sign rules in Cupertino]
45 answered
No, I didn't know19 (23) · 51%
Q4. If a campaign sign were placed on the park strip in front of your home without your permission, what would you most likely do? (select one) All of these are options Cupertino residents have under the city's sign rules.
44 answered
Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)24 (30) · 68%
File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal6 (6) · 14%
File a complaint with the city, and cover the sign in the meantime — so it isn't on display in front of my home, without my consent, while the case is worked2 (3) · 7%
Leave it — not worth the hassle0 (1) · 2%
Q5. Have you — or someone you know — ever felt pressured or intimidated to display a political sign, or had a campaign falsely tell a neighbor you supported a candidate you hadn't agreed to?
44 answered
Prefer not to say0 (0) · 0%
Q6. Imagine a candidate you support was benefiting from having opponents' signs removed or tampered with. What would you want them to do?
45 answered
Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes33 (40) · 89%
I'd accept it if it helps them win0 (0) · 0%
Q7. How important is it to you that the candidates you support run their campaigns fairly — even against candidates you strongly oppose?
45 answered
Very important34 (41) · 91%
Somewhat important2 (3) · 7%
Q8. What, if anything, should the city or community do about campaign-sign theft and unauthorized placement?
46 answered
Stronger enforcement and penalties20 (25) · 54%
More public education9 (11) · 24%
Nothing — not a real problem4 (5) · 11%
Q9. Anything else you'd like to share about campaign conduct in our community?
Open-text question (see responses below).
Q10. Which topics would you like addressed in future surveys?
Open-text question (see responses below).
Responses
Tip: use your browser's Find (Ctrl/⌘+F) to locate a verification code below.
Verification code: 02854e0270d54290a3246e7abce832ff (Verified voter) · 2026-09-26
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission · A sign put back after the resident had removed it — Nothing is being done to stop this! We have laws but they seem to be meaningless.
Q2: Yes, I knew — In Cupertino, many of the people being affected are afraid to report this.
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: File a complaint with the city, and cover the sign in the meantime — so it isn't on display in front of my home, without my consent, while the case is worked — I would try one time to have the city handle it but I don’t have much hope.
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes — If a candidate knowingly allows this it is disrespecting residents. How will they treat these residents if they are elected?
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q10: Thank you!
Verification code: 0e9687630640443b98a106fb62d6356c (Public) · 2026-09-10
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 1156c2f4fed748bfb45afd9cec455cad (Verified voter) · 2026-09-11
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission · A sign put back after the resident had removed it
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: File a complaint with the city, and cover the sign in the meantime — so it isn't on display in front of my home, without my consent, while the case is worked
Q5: Yes
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 12883481c5a54be1a923d7b20c1c14b3 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-18
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 18f3518bf7d646f1bff9d86020bdfa9e (Verified voter) · 2026-09-03
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Not sure
Q10: People racing down our neighborhood streets - not safe! Do we need more speed bumps installed or speed limit signs installed?
Verification code: 191f9d24d2524292a5cb2e6e6a75371b (Verified voter) · 2026-09-16
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Not sure — Depends
Q7: What is meant by 'fairly'?
Q8: Nothing — not a real problem
Q9: Who funds the candidates? All these signs must cost a lot of money. I'm expecting large quantities of content less election mailers over the coming weeks.
Verification code: 1dec8ecd27564847b96669485b4f5f60 (Public) · 2026-09-24
Q1: A sign put back after the resident had removed it · A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340) — I would leave the sign if it were something or someone I supported.
Q5: Yes
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 1ee18804e1234b6cba88613809a7fcd8 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-20
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 28fb9720d04d4f358190092195adf8e8 (Public) · 2026-09-12
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Not sure — The answers do not align with the problem statement; Was the candidate asked people to go take down signs or was the candidate entirely uninvolved? The answers suggest the candidate was, at least, verbally involved; there isn't anything for the situation where the candidate had no involvement at all.
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 3bd8c7816d344a5dbbdb205c6c79842f (Verified voter) · 2026-09-14
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 48a722b39f2848bba213ba352d571689 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-22
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Q9: I HATE the amount of signs out there. One block I drive down on my way to and from work every day has 6 signs for a group of 3 candidates running in some kind of bloc. At some point it becomes littering
Verification code: 48a987da4ade4711b1adea4f45c34398 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-05
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard — Saw on NextDoor.
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 52423bf8613d411595159972de46ff31 (Public) · 2026-09-15
Q1: None of the above — No signs on my block
Q2: Yes, I knew — But police should concentrate resources on crimes such as burglary, assaults, auto theft etc.
Q3: No, I didn't know — Don’t elected officials have more important issue such budgets, traffic, crime.
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340) — And recycle
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Nothing — not a real problem
Q9: You just lost my vote Mr Joao. Such pettiness is not worth my time or yours. You will have bigger issues to deal with such as school closures and budgets.
Q10: School closures, teacher salaries to allow teachers to live in Cupertino, or affordable housing for teachers. Some schools need to be closed due to lower attendance. These are hard issues that affect students, not signs on lawns.
Verification code: 5614b005c706482eb687158e52c83436 (Public) · 2026-09-03
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Leave it — not worth the hassle
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Somewhat important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 598bd40f16374f3c98b76c7a47e07222 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-25
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Not sure — These options are misleading. Unless the candidate is removing the signs themselves or encouraging their supporters to do so, the removal of their opponents signs has no implication to how "clean" their campaign is.
Q7: Very important — Again, this is a leading question.
Q8: Nothing — not a real problem
Q9: Your surveys are unscientific and biased and your energy would be better spent elsewhere.
Q10: No more surveys.
Verification code: 5b697ad89c484848a4e6a4e2d6393a89 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-04
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission · A sign put back after the resident had removed it
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: Yes
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q9: Police need to take action and be FAIR
To all candidates !
They are not .
The city council will not handle this
And in Cupertino it is happening everyday !
Verification code: 5d92541df98e4670a77ca663369f39df (Verified voter) · 2026-09-06
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 5d9572069f564c2caf3ffed9f0fbbbd1 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-06
Q1: A sign damaged or defaced · A sign removed or stolen from a front yard
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 631603d1a5214cbf9ef1b4fcd9f1d954 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-16
Q8: Nothing — not a real problem
Q9: This has nothing to do with the school board but coming from you as an individual you refer to yoiurself as a school board member. what mailing list are you using to generate your distibution list?
Q10: CSUSD issues
Verification code: 63446b609fc840ebadf8d87b7a594ca6 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-27
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes — Sign tapering takes places on both sides. In addition to bad agents on both sides I think kids are doing it too not because they believe in the politics but because they are kids.
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q9: It is not clear to me how much influence signs have on how people vote
Verification code: 65e96d38d82c416085f0a8707b319bc1 (Public) · 2026-09-04
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission · A sign put back after the resident had removed it
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: File a complaint with the city, and cover the sign in the meantime — so it isn't on display in front of my home, without my consent, while the case is worked
Q5: Yes
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 666e4431fada4bc8a95838b22bed02e2 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-17
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Not sure
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 724cf1d5c994465aa9578936986ae5bf (Verified voter) · 2026-09-03
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know — Seems rational.
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Not sure — Where I live, there is no park strip.
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 725cba49e6da4704b6843314fd2c282e (Verified voter) · 2026-09-06
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal — If the removal was not handled very promptly by the city, I would remove it myself.
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 76f20e42437d40e2a27fc29506885ccc (Verified voter) · 2026-09-20
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: 83a8811c329b4ab8b207c2bd587c20f3 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-08
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard — The damaged sign was for one particular candidate
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important — The problem is that it’s difficult these days to trust the authenticity of an election
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q9: I’ve have personally had a sign stolen from my yard
Verification code: 874fcdc9188f4c8ab8911fa17bf2bee7 (Public) · 2026-09-02
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced · A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission · A sign put back after the resident had removed it — Test. Ignore this response.
Q2: Yes, I knew — Test. Ignore this response.
Q3: Yes, I knew — Test. Ignore this response.
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340) — Test. Ignore this response.
Q5: Yes — Test. Ignore this response.
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes — Test. Ignore this response.
Q7: Very important — Test. Ignore this response.
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties — Test. Ignore this response.
Q9: Test. Ignore this response.
Q10: Test. Ignore this response.
Verification code: 89554a9221694310a035a837730f0a94 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-13
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Don't live in Cupertino, and don't have a park strip. But if it applied, I'd remove it.
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Not sure
Verification code: 8d3c56a8bf934d09aa892ef963b01064 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-16
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission · A sign put back after the resident had removed it
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q9: I’m ashamed this happens in our community. Campaign mischief of all kinds IS corrosive to democracy, not to mention to our sense of community. It just makes you feel bad.
Q10: Are people interested in helping the environment and making our city more beautiful by planting more trees?
Verification code: 8dda0d958d4f4e7bbb248c034cfc6132 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-14
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: 976ad113f876440f86bb03d5eb6cb2e7 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-16
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Not sure
Verification code: a5a5aa1964fd439c9174fa348c377fce (Verified voter) · 2026-09-09
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: a897602ca01146eeac08fe5a2798165d (Verified voter) · 2026-09-04
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew — I live in Sunnyvale
Q4: Not sure — If it was a candidate I liked, I might keep it up; otherwise I would remove it
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Not sure
Q9: What I don't understand is how you feel that you have the power to use this venue and YOUR position to address an issue that is NOT related to your position. I feel that this action is an unethical use of your power. I can only assume that your are trying to help someone you know and this is NOT the venue to do that. I will definitely remember this when YOU are up for re-election!
Q10: None - I have lost respect for your efforts
Verification code: b3db2be71b754b72b1db317764f843c4 (Public) · 2026-09-17
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard · A sign damaged or defaced
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: bce83d38bf6445f5a7b0f532c499be47 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-25
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: c38fa0ba796f4fbeb0fdd03d96b3ebb9 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-14
Q1: A sign damaged or defaced
Q2: No, I didn't know — If that is a law, I don't think that it is enforced, at all.
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: Yes
Q6: Not sure
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q9: There is way too much anger and hatred during campaigns.
Verification code: c529bba7a4c14d668681f0908e32b105 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-03
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Somewhat important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: c73091ed569f4095af547b028e09fe41 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-26
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: File a complaint with the city and leave the sign untouched while Code Enforcement handles removal
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: c730a14d29cb45bd8e1d018619d7bcb1 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-07
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Not sure
Q7: Somewhat important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: cde9ca4b8f6a4662a9f5ab223c97c61b (Verified voter) · 2026-09-09
Q1: A sign removed or stolen from a front yard — outside a restaurant
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: d3ca3aeeb12c40229b4b558938282f52 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-25
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Not sure — I have no idea how big a problem that is here.
Verification code: d54804c2a63e4d389d6bf2bdc2d3b6fe (Verified voter) · 2026-09-26
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: More public education
Verification code: d99ac196cbd54345a9a9c21cd72f028e (Verified voter) · 2026-09-07
Q1: A sign placed in a front yard without the resident's permission · A sign placed on the park strip without the adjacent resident's permission
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Q9: Ban all signs. They are not useful for a fair campaign. Do we really want people to vote on the candidate with the most signs.
Verification code: e76c3aa93e3b48e6904e520123588bea (Verified voter) · 2026-09-08
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties — In today's toxic political climate, primarily because of the aggressive manner in which the right-wing tampers with, rigs, and cheats, stronger enforcement and penalties are vital.
Verification code: fa4f07affc09433187488f514a593939 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-21
Q1: None of the above
Q2: Yes, I knew
Q3: Yes, I knew
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: Yes
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important
Q8: Stronger enforcement and penalties
Verification code: fb4d20c755774d43b27ffa8eec5b2301 (Verified voter) · 2026-09-29
Q1: None of the above
Q2: No, I didn't know
Q3: No, I didn't know
Q4: Remove it myself — the code lets the adjacent resident take an unauthorized sign down (§ 19.104.340)
Q5: No
Q6: Stop it and run a clean campaign — even if it costs them votes
Q7: Very important — The exception would be if the opponent is acting unfairly and there is nothing being done to stop it, then using the same tactics to avoid being at a disadvantage for being honest is acceptable.
Q8: Nothing — not a real problem
Q9: This does not seem like an important issue to me.
